---
name: hyb-oa-delivery
description: "Use for hyb-oa project delivery tasks: natural-language triage, planning with Issue CSV, implementing Fastify/Prisma or React/Vite changes, refining PC/mobile/WeCom UI, reimbursement/invoice/OCR/attachment work, trial-run troubleshooting, automated/visual verification, and Chinese batch commits."
---

# hyb-oa Delivery

Use this skill when working in `/home/shunli/Projects/hyb-oa` or when the user asks to continue planning, implementation, trial-run validation, visual QA, reimbursement/invoice improvements, Enterprise WeChat checks, deployment preparation, or project-wide review.

## Required Reading

Read only what is relevant:

- Always read `AGENTS.md` and the newest relevant `issues/*.csv`.
- After R5, first check the main R5/R6 contract status before planning trial-run or follow-up work; R5 must remain the completed gate and R6 must have its own Issue CSV before expanding scope.
- For UI/page work, PC/mobile/WeCom experience, approval UX, or domestic OA benchmarking, read `docs/产品设计规则.md` and `references/visual-qa.md`. DG8 makes Feishu workbench/approval the single main UI/layout reference, with Hyinda branding and project rules taking priority. DG9 adds the A/B/C page layering and shared workbench/mobile samples; choose the DG9 sample before designing or coding a page. Other products are only function/process/control references. Mobile page work must treat `docs/产品设计规则.md` as the source of truth for the unified mobile shell, icon grid, card lists, deep Push pages, sticky actions, safe-area, and cross-viewport matrix. 移动页必须先对齐该设计事实源，再进入实现或验证。
- For approval workflow, roles, self-approval, notification, deeplink, reminder, or escalation work, read `docs/需求-统一审批中心规约.md`.
- For HR lifecycle, employee onboarding/offboarding, Enterprise WeChat directory sync, account disablement, or Enterprise WeChat API work, read `docs/需求-企业微信基础设施规约.md`, `docs/企微API能力目录.md`, `docs/管理员手册.md`, and the latest HCLT/HRWD/WAPI/WRRA Issue CSV evidence first.
- For any Enterprise WeChat capability, Secret, callback, approval, check-in, HR assistant, or contact-directory task, read `docs/企微API能力目录.md` before planning or coding. WAPI fixes the current Secret matrix: contacts use `WECOM_CONTACT_SECRET`; workbench/OAuth/messages/HR assistant/roster/check-in/approval use `WECOM_AGENT_SECRET`; `WECOM_CHECKIN_SECRET` is only an explicit check-in override; `WECOM_HR_ASSISTANT_SECRET` is historical compatibility and not a default. Do not write runtime code that tries multiple Secrets to guess the correct one.
- For Enterprise WeChat-first HR/attendance runtime migration, read `docs/企微优先开发路线图.md` before planning or coding. WDRG makes the roadmap authoritative for stage order; WAPI adds the runtime-first stage before deep mirror work; WRRA states that WOUA `PASS_WITH_FINDINGS` does not clear deep mirror work; WOUA-FIX has now soft-archived the 7 OA active test accounts missing in WeCom, fixed the `T0000` seed reactivation behavior, transferred the `SMOKE201` test-manager side effects, and rerun WOUA with `oaActiveMissingInWecom=0`. WCPC has rerun the capability POC with an existing active test account and reached `GO_TO_HR_MASTER_SYNC`; WHMS/WHMSLIVE has implemented, deployed, and publicly verified `wecom_hr_master_sync_v1`, with the production flag restored to `force_off` and production real-employee batch apply not approved. WMSG1 proves real app-message delivery and Deeplink return only; WAPC1 fixes the approval configuration preparation checklist before mirror work; WAPC2 adds the leave/missed-punch approval template and low-risk `sp_no` read-only POC runner. WPROC1 fixes the engineering route: WAPC2 must be followed by WAPC2F automatic POC fixtures, WAPC2 rerun, WCBK1 callback POC, WACP3 compensation-pull POC, and WADM1 mirror data model design before `wecom_attendance_approval_mirror_v1`. Do not start `wecom_attendance_approval_mirror_v1`, `oa_hr_emergency_mode_v1`, `wecom_recovery_writeback_v1`, or `wecom_ruleops_v1` without the next stage's own Issue CSV.
- For reimbursement, invoice, OCR, duplicate invoice, or attachment work, read `docs/报销发票附件规则.md` and `references/reimbursement.md`.
- For local/WeCom/public trial-run, OCR runtime, Caddy, or DB drift work, read `docs/试运行与自动化验证手册.md` and `references/trialrun.md`.
- For how this skill should evolve, read `docs/Agent开发交付实践.md`.

## Natural-Language Triage

Users may assign work with a plain paragraph. Before asking follow-up questions, classify the request into defect, feature, acceptance feedback, plan, review, QA, deployment, design, or product-flow optimization.

Default behavior:

1. Extract intent, target surface, constraints, approval state, and next action.
2. Check existing assets before declaring a blocker: `issues/`, `docs/`, `artifacts/`, `output/`, scripts, Playwright tests, runbooks, and prior trial-run evidence.
3. Ask only when required by `AGENTS.md` or safety: missing approval for non-trivial coding, destructive data work, production config, secrets/accounts, conflicting goals, or unclear high-risk acceptance.
4. Treat a plain "确认" as approval for the immediately preceding explicit plan or Issue CSV, unless multiple candidates exist.
5. If the user asks whether a problem is real, verify first with automation, code inspection, public checks, or visual evidence before proposing broad changes.

## Delivery Loop

1. Check `git status --short`; do not revert unrelated user changes.
2. Identify the current active continuous Issue CSV before non-trivial work. Same-type trial-run feedback, real-device feedback, single-surface defects, and small follow-up fixes must append rows or update Notes in the active flow instead of creating one-off CSVs. Create a new CSV only when no active same-type flow exists, the current flow is closed, the change crosses risk/business domains, or the user explicitly asks for a new contract; if creating one, state why the active flows cannot carry it. After R5, distinguish R6 preparation from actual trial-run execution.
3. State the implementation approach before editing code; if already approved, proceed.
4. Keep changes scoped to the current Issue.
5. Prefer existing project patterns, official SDKs, and the main UI/layout hierarchy in `docs/产品设计规则.md`; for page work, classify the page into DG9 A/B/C layering and reuse the matching workbench/mobile sample before adding local layout code. Do not mix multiple competitor visual systems or copy competitor flows/text directly.
6. Verify with the narrowest relevant automated tests, then expand by risk.
7. Use Playwright screenshots or visual metrics for PC/mobile/WeCom UI changes. New or changed mobile pages must join the unified responsive system and the 320/360/375/390/393/414/430px 统一视觉矩阵 rather than adding page-specific layout fixes.
8. Dedicated `/mobile` pages must use the shared mobile slot/card/list/sticky-action system from `docs/产品设计规则.md`: fixed icon/avatar/status slots, `minmax(0, 1fr)` copy slots, `mobile-card`/mobile list cards, `mobile-field-row`, mobile tokens, and no desktop `card-std p-4/p-5/p-6` as a mobile main container.
9. Mobile homepage, approval, notification, and business cards must follow the display dedupe rules in `docs/产品设计规则.md`: one pending/progress summary per page, notifications as event stream with direct target links, bottom badges as counts only, and one visible business identifier/status per card or row.
10. Update Issue CSV statuses only after the stated `Test_Method` passes.
11. Commit in Chinese batches with Issue IDs.
12. 面向用户可测试的改动，最终必须明确“是否已部署”。只有部署与公网检查通过后，才能告知用户可以去企业微信或公网试运行环境测试。

## Default Verification Matrix

Backend:

```bash
cd server && npm run prisma:validate
cd server && node --check src/routes/reimbursements.js
cd server && node --check src/routes/workflow.js
```

Frontend:

```bash
cd client && npm run typecheck
cd client && npm run build
```

Cross-device UI:

```bash
cd client && npx playwright test <relevant-spec> --workers=1 --reporter=list
```

Docs/Skill:

```bash
python3 /home/shunli/.codex/skills/plan/scripts/validate_issues_csv.py <issue.csv>
python3 /home/shunli/.codex/skills/.system/skill-creator/scripts/quick_validate.py .agents/skills/hyb-oa-delivery
git diff --check
```

## Stop Conditions

Pause for user confirmation before:

- Resetting, rebuilding, or destructively modifying a database.
- Resolving Prisma migration drift by editing migration history.
- Changing production Caddy/systemd/remote deployment state.
- Using or exposing real secrets.
- Reverting unrelated dirty files.

## Output Contract

Final responses should include:

- What changed.
- What was verified, with commands.
- 面向用户可测改动的部署状态：commit hash、公网 URL、`/ready`、公网前端资源/文案检查，以及用户现在是否可以测试。
- What remains blocked and why.
- Commit hashes when commits were made.

## R6 and Trial-Run Defaults

- R6 can start only from a new Issue CSV that fixes users, roles, time window, rollback contact, issue log, and daily closeout rhythm.
- R6 scope defaults to reimbursement, leave, procurement, approval, Enterprise WeChat entry/notification, finance payment/export.
- Do not expand to budget, ERP, AI, full travel, or complex BPM during R6; record those as follow-up Issues.
- Enterprise WeChat personal app message is the formal approval notification channel after R5; mock and group bots are not acceptance evidence for R6 business notification.
- After WAPI, ERP is not a future OA integration target. HR/attendance employee daily approvals (leave, missed punch, outing, overtime) should reuse mature Enterprise WeChat capabilities first, while OA provides domain-based mirror, manual takeover, recovery writeback, finance closeout, and audit. Reimbursement, payment batches, AP, accounting handoff, procurement, expenses, contracts, projects, sensitive attachments, invoices, bank receipts, and accounting handoff materials remain OA-primary unless a later Issue changes that domain explicitly. OA-primary approvals may send Enterprise WeChat personal-app notifications, but messages must contain only dehydrated title/type/no/status/deeplink; do not upload procurement forms, contract bodies, quotes, supplier files, invoices, bank receipts, or accounting materials to WeCom native approvals or WeCom attachments. Before runtime migration, read `docs/企微API能力目录.md` and `docs/企微优先开发路线图.md`, run or check `WECOM-CAPABILITY-POC-V1`/WCPC, and classify each capability as `CAN_REUSE_NOW`, `NEEDS_CONFIG`, `NEEDS_API_POC`, `KEEP_OA_PRIMARY`, or `NOT_SUPPORTED_BY_API`; missing Secret, callback, template, trusted IP, visible scope, or API permission must be recorded as `SKIP/BLOCKED_BY_EXTERNAL_CONFIG`, not PASS. Current WAPI rule: contacts read with `WECOM_CONTACT_SECRET` and `POST /cgi-bin/user/list_id`; HR assistant/roster uses `WECOM_AGENT_SECRET` and `POST /cgi-bin/hr/get_staff_info`; check-in defaults to `WECOM_AGENT_SECRET` with optional explicit `WECOM_CHECKIN_SECRET`; approval template/detail reads use `WECOM_AGENT_SECRET`; no runtime Secret guessing. Current WCPC status: existing active test account `SMOKE002/测试员工` (reported only as `oa_smoke***`) reran successfully with report `/tmp/wecom-capability-poc-wcpc-smoke002/summary.json`, `status=PASS`, `conclusion=GO_TO_HR_MASTER_SYNC`, and `blockingCapabilities=[]`. Current WHMSLIVE status: `wecom_hr_master_sync_v1` is implemented and deployed with feature flag default/final `force_off`, HR/contact read service, dry-run/apply, sync run/item records, People management card, and QA-only runner `scripts/qa/check-wecom-hr-master-sync.mjs`; public verification applied migration `20260518184319_wecom_hr_master_sync_v1`, temporarily forced the flag on, ran dry-run and explicit apply for `SMOKE002` (`oa_smoke***`), verified ordinary employee API denial with 403, then restored `force_off`. The SMOKE002 apply did not write OA master data because WeCom lacks phone/email/department and was correctly skipped as `missing_required_field`; production real-employee batch apply is not approved. WHMS rules: missing OA-required fields are skipped as `missing_required_field`, inactive WeCom status becomes `needs_offboarding_confirmation`, and OA accounts are not auto-disabled. WOUA-FIX rerun result remains `PASS_WITH_FINDINGS` only because 5 matched WeCom users lack accepted fields and one archived test binding is retained; `oaActiveMissingInWecom=0`, active OA employees 5/5 match WeCom. WRV1 adds QA-only `npm run check:wecom-runtime-ready` to verify entry, OAuth/bindings, dehydrated app-message dry-run, OA deeplink, contact `user/list_id`, HR assistant `get_staff_info`, and check-in short-window reads; WRA1 fixes the check-in gate so `WECOM_CHECKIN_SYNC_ENABLED` remains only the formal sync-batch switch, while QA-only runtime checks pass `requireSyncEnabled=false` for read-only probing and still block on real Secret, trusted IP, visible scope, permission, or WeCom API failures. WRA1 public report `/app/artifacts/qa-flow/wecom-runtime-ready-20260518T180506Z/summary.json` is `PASS_WITH_CONFIG_GAPS`: entry/OAuth, Secret matrix, OA active bindings, contact, HR assistant, message dry-run, and check-in read passed, with check-in recorded as `readable_sync_disabled`. Real message sending still requires both `--send-test-message` and `WECOM_RUNTIME_TEST_SEND=1`. Approval template ID, approval `sp_no`, callback config, attendance/approval mirror, emergency mode, recovery writeback, RuleOps, and HR write APIs remain later-stage gaps. WAPC1 fixed the approval configuration preparation checklist but did not implement callbacks or mirror. WAPC2 adds `npm run check:wecom-approval-poc` for leave/missed-punch `gettemplatedetail` and low-risk `getapprovaldetail`; missing template ID or `sp_no` must remain `PARTIAL_APPROVAL_POC_NEEDS_CONFIG`, and API/permission/trusted-IP/scope failures remain `SKIP/BLOCKED_BY_EXTERNAL_CONFIG`. WPROC1 adds Definition of Ready, Definition of Done, automatic-first gates, and non-self approval requirements. WAPC2F defaults to applicant `SMOKE002` and approver `SMOKE101`; both must be active, bound, visible, and not the same OA employee or WeCom userid. If `SMOKE101` is unavailable, stop and ask the user instead of switching to another approver. Do not skip stage order: `WECOM-CAPABILITY-POC-V1`/WCPC -> `wecom_hr_master_sync_v1`/WHMSLIVE -> `runtime_first_wecom_enablement`/WAPI+WOUA rerun -> `WOUA-FIX / WECOM-RUNTIME-READY-V1` -> `WAPC1 审批配置准备` -> `WAPC2 请假/补卡只读 POC` -> `WAPC2F 自动生成 POC 样件` -> `WAPC2 自动复跑` -> `WCBK1 回调只读 POC` -> `WACP3 补偿拉取 POC` -> `WADM1 镜像数据模型设计` -> `wecom_attendance_approval_mirror_v1` -> `oa_hr_emergency_mode_v1` -> `wecom_recovery_writeback_v1` -> `wecom_ruleops_v1`. UI and API work must distinguish `OA 主办`, `企微镜像`, and `OA 应急接管`. OA-driven Enterprise WeChat directory create/update/disable is live verified; for later HR/WeCom directory issues, first check configuration, permission, department, and data-specific causes before treating the capability as unfinished.
- WMSG1 has verified real Enterprise WeChat personal-app delivery and Deeplink return: report `/app/artifacts/qa-flow/wecom-runtime-ready-20260518T234431Z/summary.json` has `checks.message.status=OK`, `errcode=0`, and `recipientCount=1`; the user confirmed receiving "OA 运行就绪检查" and opening the OA notifications page from the message. This only clears message/deeplink runtime evidence; approval template ID, approval `sp_no`, callback config, and deep mirror work remain separate later gates.
- WAPC1 has fixed the WeCom approval configuration preparation gate: first templates are leave, missed punch, outing, and overtime; each needs template ID, scope, fields, approver rules, visible scope, and self-built app permission; low-risk test `sp_no` must not contain procurement, contract, reimbursement, invoice, bank receipt, sensitive attachment, or real sensitive business material; callback URL/Token/EncodingAESKey are deployment-only values and must not be written to repo docs or Issue CSV. Do not implement real approval callback handling, deep mirror, emergency mode, recovery writeback, or RuleOps until a later approved Issue covers the POC or implementation.
- WAPC2 has added the WeCom approval template/detail read-only POC runner for leave and missed punch. Use `npm run check:wecom-approval-poc`; pass template IDs with `--template=leave:<id>` / `--template=missed_punch:<id>` and low-risk test approval numbers with `--sp-no=leave:<sp_no>` / `--sp-no=missed_punch:<sp_no>`. The runner must use only `WECOM_AGENT_SECRET`, redact full template IDs and `sp_no`, and never output form values, attachments, comments, full userid, token, Secret, or raw payload.
- WPROC1 fixes the WeCom approval engineering process. Future WeCom work must satisfy route gate, capability gate, and implementation gate; use automatic runners before asking the user to do manual work. Manual work is limited to write approval, secrets/callback config, WeCom backend settings that cannot be API-driven, real-device confirmation, and risk decisions. High-risk stages require POC before implementation: callback signature/decryption/idempotency, compensation pull, mirror data model, then mirror implementation.
- Approval-chain correctness can be proven by PC or automation, while Enterprise WeChat validates entry, binding,免登录, notification, deeplink, and mobile layout.
- If real-device mobile validation is paused after automation passes, record the gate as `PAUSED`; do not close RS6/UI6/R6 mobile blockers until representative real-device confirmation is recorded.
- Role-specific pages should use one shared OA/mobile framework and tailor summaries, entries, actions, and sensitive fields by role. Do not create unrelated UI systems for employee, approver, finance, admin, or CEO views.
- After MUD6, `R6-ISSUE-001` is treated as resolved based on representative real-device confirmation; future mobile regressions should be recorded as new Issues rather than reopening the old WCM6/MME6 gate unless the same production behavior returns.
- After AP6, approval reminder, overdue reminder, and workflow productivity summary are current product facts, not open planning items. Reuse `POST /api/workflow/tasks/:taskId/remind`, `GET /api/workflow/tasks/summary`, `job:workflow-overdue-reminders`, existing workflow history, audit logs, notifications, and WeCom personal app delivery semantics. Do not add a parallel reminder channel, change approval status from reminders, or expand into complex BPM/SLA escalation without a new Issue.
- After DG7/MRF7, mobile approval is an "approval and progress" entry: employees may use it for submitted-item progress, while approvers use it for assigned tasks. Do not reintroduce disabled approval tabs for ordinary employees, duplicated home pending lists, or notification cards that only bounce users back to the notification center when a business target exists.
- After RI6, LP6, ME6 automation, QG6, MIF7/MIF7T, MIF7TD, R7/OPS7/DOC7 draft materials, R7EP automatic gates, and OPS8 remote read-only checks, treat `ME6-3` as closed by representative iPhone 12, iPhone 14, and Redmi K60 Enterprise WeChat feedback. R7EP may conclude that the project can enter R7E human confirmation, but `R7E-*` true execution rows must stay `TODO` until the user confirms participants, roles, window, rollback contact, issue owner, daily closeout, and pause/rollback decision maker. Do not start real R7 from documentation or automation gates alone; future mobile or real-device regressions must be recorded as new Issues such as UX8/R7E follow-ups.
- After DCL7, document governance must start from `docs/文档索引.md` and `docs/文档事实源状态矩阵.md`. Use Chinese-first current docs. Confirmed obsolete docs may be physically removed from the current tree and restored from git history when needed; do not create `docs/archive/` just to move clutter. Do not rewrite old Issue CSV snapshots when cleaning current docs.